Power-distribution architectures are evolving to meet the energy needs of artificial-intelligence workloads. Data-center power consumption regularly makes headlines, with consumers fearing that data-center operators are driving up electricity prices. The IEA expects that power demands will continue to rise as data centers increasingly run demanding artificial-intelligence (AI) workloads. The agency estimates that data-center energy consumption reached 415 TWh in 2024, representing 1.5% of global energy consumption, and will increase to 945 TWh annually by 2030. [1] Q: What accounts for this increase in power—more data centers or more power-consumption per data center? A: Both. Each data center that comes online is likely to require more power than an older facility. Estimates suggest that a single server rack within a data center will consume 1.5 MW in power by 2028, up from an estimated 400 kW in 2026. [2] Q: What steps can be taken to limit data-center power consumption? A: One key factor is maximizing power efficiency . That is, ensuring that the power consumed goes to the compute engines and is not wasted in the power-conversion components and power-distribution conductors. Q: How can we maximize efficiency? A: To answer that question, it helps to understand how data-center power-distribution architectures have evolved over the years. Figure 1 at the top shows a traditional power-distribution architecture. Figure 1. Power distribution within data centers is evolving from AC (top) to DC (bottom). (Image: Rick Nelson) In this example, the utility grid or an on-premises generator provides three-phase 13 kVAC, which a stepdown transformer converts to 480 VAC. In the event of a grid failure, an uninterruptibl e power supply (UPS) can provide 480-VAC power until a backup generator can be brought online. Finally, a distribution panel routes single-phase 277-VAC (the line-to-neutral value of three-phase 480 VAC) to a power-supply unit (PSU) in each server tray, which derives 12 VDC for powering various point-of-load (POL) regulators throughout the tray’s electronics. Q: What’s the drawback to this approach? A: You can choose from a variety of UPS configurations. [3] The one shown in Figure 1 is an online double-conversion topology. This approach provides the highest quality sine-wave output and zero transfer time, but the continuous AC/DC conversion followed by DC/AC inversion exacts an efficiency penalty. Q: What’s the solution? A: One approach is to move the backup storage downstream, thereby minimizing the conversion and inversion losses. In Figure 1 at the bottom, a single AC/DC converter per rack replaces the PSU per tray (red arrow) and establishes a 50-VDC bus (orange arrow) with battery or capacitor backup (blue arrow). The bus powers an intermediate bus converter (IBC) [4] in each tray, which develops a 12-VDC level for the POL regulators within the tray electronics. Q: You mentioned that rack power will reach 1.5 MW soon. That would be a lot of current at 50 VDC. A: Right, 30,000 A, a totally impractical amount to handle in a standard server rack. Consequently, the industry is exploring 800-VDC architectures ( Figure 2 ). Such a system would have a grid-side AC-output battery energy storage system (BESS) for grid backup. A solid-state transformer/rectifier would develop an 800-VDC bus, which would power high-voltage IBCs (HV IBCs) in each server tray, with DC bus battery or capacitor backup optional. Figure 2. A power architecture with an 800-VDC bus can power server racks rated 1 MW and higher. (Image: Rick Nelson) Q: What’s the status of this architecture? A: Nvidia is promulgating this architecture in partnership with semiconductor and equipment manufacturers in the data-center electrical ecosystem. NVIDIA suggests such systems could be deployed in 2027 and that the architecture could support compute racks rated up to 8 MW. [5] Q: What are the test and measurement implications for these systems? A: Impedance is the ke